Thursday, March 03, 2011


I was about to write about Sara Palin's latest tweet and how she has NO CLUE what the First Amendment means, when I stumbled upon an article that wrote exactly what I was about to. I'm not sure how to feel about that--was my thought original, even if simultaneously thought of by someone else? A simple internet search showed that I was not "original" insofar as someone else had already thought AND written about it, but still--why bother rewriting something now? In any case, the article is here. Bluf:
Under Palin's interpretation of the First Amendment, criticism of public figures threatens free speech, but peaceful protests she doesn't like should be banned.


Post a Comment

<< Home